Kip Petroff 1 Comment

Smith & Nephew Hip Implant Litigation Website Launched Today

Today is the day I launch my new website. It is dedicated to highlighting the metal on metal hip implant products and related conduct of Smith & Nephew, a multibillion-dollar medical device company from the United Kingdom. I looked around for websites that discussed Smith & Nephew, and I couldn’t find any resources that were helpful. That’s one reason I’m dedicating my new website to this company’s metal hip implants and the ongoing litigation against them nationwide.


    • Why Smith & Nephew? I have spent most of the last three years working on personal injury cases involving Smith & Nephew hip implants, and that has given me the chance to get to know this company. What I’ve learned is shocking. This website will focus on some of the ways that Smith & Nephew has manipulated our regulatory and legal system in this country over the years. The new pages today provide only a rough outline of what is to come. I will add to this reference library regularly. My goal is to provide an online library of regulatory and legal information about this company and their metal-on-metal hip implants that have harmed and continue to harm many people nationwide on a regular basis.
    • What’s in the website? My new website has many features that will make it easy to understand why I’m so interested in tracking this company. I will preview some of my favorite features here.
    • Timeline. One of my favorite new features is a Smith & Nephew timeline that begins with the FDA’s first classification meeting over metal-on-metal hip implants in 2001 and ends with the FDA issuing its final order regulating metal-on-metal hips in 2016. In between is a detailed account of what Smith & Nephew did to get its metal-on-metal hip portfolio cleared in the U.S. and when it began pulling these disastrous devices from the market. It is color coded based on the topics covered. For example, purple is regulatory and orange is for tracking this company’s criminal activities involving their hip implants.  Make sure to expand the timeline to see it better. There is more information there than you may realize.
    • Court Documents and Filings. I will gather and comment on some of my favorite court documents in this section of the “Smith & Nephew Legal Page.” There are so many to choose from! I will add to this page regularly.
    • Criminal Proceedings. Smith & Nephew got in trouble for the way they sold their hip implants in the U.S. and internationally. They paid more than one hundred million dollars in fines and had to agree to several years of direct regulatory oversight to avoid more serious criminal punishment. Read about it in the “Criminal Proceedings” section of the “Smith & Nephew Legal Page.”
    • Regulatory Shenanigans. Smith & Nephew is a company that had difficulty convincing the FDA to clear their metal hip implant systems for sale in this country. The documents in the “Regulatory Violations” section of the “Smith & Nephew Legal Page” will focus on some of the company’s unsuccessful attempts to obtain clearance for their metal on metal hip implant systems. The company followed the same pattern of (1) filing an application for clearance, followed by (2) failure, then (3) asking for more time, and then (4) withdrawing the application rather than complying with FDA requirements. The company tried to obtain clearance in this manner for their metal on metal hip system three times over five-plus years but met failure each time. But that didn’t stop Smith & Nephew from selling their hip implants anyway. I will explain how they did that in future pages on this website.
  • Comments? Questions? I hope this new website is useful and informative. I welcome feedback, good or bad, about these pages. Use my online contact form to provide feedback, questions, or ideas for future Smith & Nephew topics to discuss here.
Kip Petroff 2 Comments


Yesterday was a good day for people fighting Smith & Nephew over defective metal on metal hip implants. On March 1, 2018, the U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia ruled in favor of the consumers in Walter and Vivian Shuker v. Smith & Nephew. Sickened by the implants he received in 2009, Mr. Shuker’s case landed in the Federal appeals court process, where I watched it for the past two + years. The good guys won yesterday, and it spells trouble for Smith & Nephew, an overseas company with a reputation for selling harmful, unapproved hip implants.

  • Unapproved Hip Parts.

Mr. Shuker’s metal on metal implant case was unusual for many reasons. For one, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officially weighed in on the legal arguments and actually filed a brief in Federal court. Secondly, it involved a combination of metal parts that received FDA clearances through two entirely different regulatory classification systems. The specific combination of Smith & Nephew parts in this case involved an “R3 Shell and Liner”, a femoral head, and a stem that connected the metal head to the thighbone. The metal liner was FDA approved as a “Class III device”, meaning it supposedly underwent a rigorous pre-market approval process. The other parts, however, all were cleared as Class II devices, involving a much more lenient process.

In the end, the Third Circuit ruled that the Shukers should have a chance to prove that Smith & Nephew is legally responsible for injuries caused by the unapproved device combo.  But it hasn’t been smooth sailing. Far from it! While Smith & Nephew must face the Shukers’ claims for negligently promoting this combination of parts for use together, the Court threw out claims for strict products liability, breach of warranty, and general negligence.  But after more than four years of waiting, this victory should be encouraging for all people with failing Smith & Nephew hip implants!

  • Trouble for Smith & Nephew.

The Shuker case is similar to another case against Smith & Nephew, Joe Mink v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. In 2017, I presented oral argument in the Mink case in the U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Miami. Mink and Shuker are unique in that, to date, they are the only two Federal Appeals Court metal on metal hip implant cases in the country decided against Smith & Nephew. It is doubtful they will remain alone! Smith & Nephew’s unapproved metal on metal hip implants used for hip replacements are failing at an alarming rate.  New cases are being filed against this company weekly and nationwide. There is an active and growing mass of Smith & Nephew cases in Baltimore Federal Court in MDL # 2775.

Smith & Nephew, Inc. is a Tennessee company whose parent company, Smith & Nephew, plc, is an international, multi-billion-dollar enterprise based in the United Kingdom. Smith & Nephew’s disdain for the FDA is apparent, leaving in its profitable wake failure after failure after failure. For three years, I’ve devoted myself practically full-time to seeking justice for those injured by this British company’s arrogance. For various reasons that I’ll explain in future blogs, Smith & Nephew has managed to largely avoid the costly nationwide litigation that ensnared its competitors in the metal hip implant industry. Yesterday’s win in Philadelphia is especially encouraging, signaling a new era of accountability.

  • No more FDA Shenanigans.

In 2016, the FDA finally changed regulatory requirements in this country for manufacturers of metal hip systems used for total hip replacements. (See “METAL HIP IMPLANT MAKERS STOP SELLING PRODUCTS RATHER THAN PROVE THEY ARE SAFE”, posted on March 8, 2016). The FDA had previously allowed metal hip implants to be sold in this country via a regulatory “fast track” loophole, but growing concern about their safety and effectiveness resulted in the FDA basically closing that loophole for good in May 2016. The FDA gave the companies more than three years advance notice and then issued an Order requiring them to quit selling the devices or prove they were safe by May of 2016. I predicted in early 2016 that none of the hip implant makers would try to prove their products were safe and effective, and I was right. The companies all chose to quietly discontinue selling their metal hip replacement systems as soon as the FDA required them to prove they were safe and effective.

Smith & Nephew, however, was able to avoid FDA scrutiny of their metal hips because the company never obtained approval to sell a metal on metal hip replacement system in the first place. The companies that legally sold FDA-cleared implants had to undergo the expense and embarrassment of publicly withdrawing their bad products. But in an ironic and twisted turn of events, Smith & Nephew was exempt from complying with the FDA’s orders because it had never obtained approval to sell metal on metal hip replacements in the first place. The one company that never obtained approval was also the only company that did not have to comply with the May 2016 deadline.

And so, while yesterday was a banner day, signaling a new era of accountability, it is still just the beginning. Other hip implant manufacturers have been paying significant settlement money for hip implant injuries for years, but Smith & Nephew has managed to benefit from its unique position of non-approval and non-regulation … until recently. I predict Smith & Nephew, a British mega-company that routinely engages in regulatory shenanigans in this country, will pay a hefty price for their smugness. And when it happens, I’ll be there to tell you I predicted it all.

Kip Petroff No Comments



My friend was looking for a lawyer for a business dispute and was at a loss. She didn’t know who to hire or how to even get started looking, so she began by asking me. I pointed her in the right direction, but her quest made me realize that most people – those who don’t practice law – lack the resources to find good legal counsel.

So how does a non-lawyer determine who is a qualified candidate for their particular case? Of course, you can’t get all the information for your decision in this Blog, but I’ll try to help with some general questions and considerations that apply to most cases.

General Considerations. Does your case involve a fairly typical fact pattern, like an automobile intersection collision? Or does it involve some unusual legal issue? Is yours the type of case where you want a local lawyer or is there some strategic benefit to having a lawyer nearer where the lawsuit might be filed? Are you looking for a specialist? Do you want to pay by the hour or are you more comfortable with a contingent fee?

Read more

Kip Petroff No Comments


I don’t like drug and medical device companies that cheat or make bad products, and it looks to me like the manufacturers of metal on metal hip implants are some of the biggest cheaters and have made some of the worst medical products ever. A Dallas, Texas jury apparently agreed with me, and last week unanimously found that a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, the baby powder people, sold defectively designed metal on metal hip implants that significantly harmed five people. The jury awarded more than $400 million in punitive and compensatory damages against Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiary after a ten-week trial. I watched almost every day of that trial, and I came away with a good understanding of how bad these particular medical products are and how much harm they can cause. I also know that far too many people are unaware of the silent harm that these products can cause. This is because the manufacturers, the government, and far too many doctors don’t publicize when bad products, like metal on metal hip implants, are unleashed on the public.

Read more

Kip Petroff No Comments


One of my previous blogs mentioned that medical device makers could learn something from frozen food manufacturers who seem more concerned about customer safety than about company brand and damage control. I suggested that two ice cream makers caught up in a Listeria crisis last year exhibited more compassion and common sense than most medical device makers when it came time to pull bad products from store shelves.

Read more

Kip Petroff No Comments

Medical Device Makers should follow Frozen Treat Makers’ Recall Strategy

Two makers of ice cream and frozen yogurt products issued voluntary recalls of ALL their frozen treats this week amid fears of potential listeria contamination. This has provided a glimpse into the way two different frozen food companies have contemporaneously handled similar product safety crises, and it also offers a chance to highlight how irresponsibly and unprofessionally some medical device companies handle their own product safety disasters. There will undoubtedly be some who will criticize the frozen treat companies for being too slow or not responsive enough to their respective crises, but even those critics would have to agree that medical device companies could learn from following the frozen treat companies’ recall strategies.

Read more

Kip Petroff No Comments


Posted 9-29-14

When trying to decide on the latest gadget or novelty, it is easy to become overwhelmed with the massive amounts of information (and misinformation) readily available at the click of a mouse. And while buying has become a type of instantaneous gratification, so has the disappointment of learning that your latest purchase may have also been your latest mistake! We are high tech, speed-driven, information-rich, go-getters with in-boxes full of very important distractions and very little time to allow ourselves to become distracted. So stopping everything to find your receipt and complete a complaint form is the last thing on your mind.

Read more

Kip Petroff No Comments

Wonder if it’s worth complaining? How seven complaints in Fargo, North Dakota resulted in the largest and most expensive drug recall in American History.

My last blog urged consumers to speak up about defective products. Consumers are the ones with the most information, but when faced with the task of actually filing a report, some are understandably hesitant. It’s the same kind of reluctance that keeps many well-minded citizens from voting: “Why bother? My opinion will never make a difference anyway!” But the truth is you can make a difference.

Read more

Kip Petroff No Comments

Fight Back Against Bad Products: Let Your Voice Be Heard

My last blog pointed out that safety and health products are, all too often, deceptively dangerous. In combination with automobiles, the US has had a total of more than  fifty million faulty products recalled in just the first 7 months of this year. That’s more than 200,000 a day! How can anyone say this is not a defective products crisis?

Some would view this as a sign that our system is broken. Others might view it as a sign that things are getting better – after all, fifty million hazardous products are off the streets, right? Either way, the common thread is that consumer complaints were the impetus that forced manufacturers’ hands. When smart shoppers raise their collective voices and demand safe, quality products, big businesses have no choice but to listen.

Read more

Kip Petroff No Comments

“Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing” – dangerous safety and health products

My last blog discussed automobile recalls, a hot topic because vehicles are increasingly important to our survival. They connect individuals to their jobs and livelihoods, provide access to active lives, and they are convenient. Drivers spend years paying off pricey loans so they can drive shiny status symbols.

Yet, a car can also be a 4000 pound weapon hurtling amongst other 4000 pound weapons if a driver, through no fault of his own, loses the ability to control it. This has been the case in many automotive recalls, including the many millions recalled this year alone involving faulty GM ignition switches. Loss of life can be tremendous, leaving survivors and their families wanting answers. Could this have been prevented? What did the manufacturer know, and when did they know it? What prevented them from making it right before my loved one was injured or killed? These are questions we all ask when companies are caught doing the unthinkable; rarely will the answers provide peace.

Read more